$txt['mentions'] = 'Mentions'; $txt['scheduled_task_removeMentions'] = 'Remove seen mentions'; $txt['scheduled_task_desc_removeMentions'] = 'Automatically removes seen mentions older than the specified days'; Show Posts - Harry Hotspur

Show Posts - Harry Hotspur

Welcome to Yorkshire Rugby Forum - The home of Yorkshire rugby chat.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Harry Hotspur

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5
1
Regional Two (North & North East) / Fixtures are out
« on: June 13, 2022, 06:07:59 PM »
Fixtures can be found on RFU North

2
Other Senior Rugby / Re: Update on Future League Structure
« on: August 15, 2020, 10:55:14 AM »
I foresee a break away Yorkshire league in the offing. Looks like 12 team leagues from next season

3
If clubs are unable to play their remaining 4/5 games, then it follows that the play off won't be played either, so if that's the case the logical response would be to promote York and relegate YM & West, but the RFU aren't renowned for logic

4
Other Senior Rugby / Re: Adult male competition structure review
« on: January 31, 2020, 05:33:54 PM »
Has anyone completed the Adult Male Future Competitions Survey which was sent out this afternoon?
Detailed introduction and stats.

https://t.co/k9s4SSKbro?amp=1

I don't think you have to be invited to complete the survey. The RFU seem hell bent on reducing the leagues to 12 as there are no options for 14.

5
Other Senior Rugby / Re: Adult male competition structure review
« on: November 11, 2019, 05:59:55 PM »
Looks like there is another meeting on 14th November

Adult Male Competition Structure Group
Why is this work happening?
? There has been over 30 years of league rugby in the adult male game in England, with arguably relatively few major changes in recent times, and this is set against the context of a greatly changing socio-economic landscape and new standards of player welfare considerations.
? Whilst the game generally continues to buck the downward participation trend seen in some other team sports, there is an accepted view from all available evidence that it is the female and age grade sectors of the Game that are supporting this. In the adult male game whilst the playing pool continues to grow, players are playing less often, and have different wants and needs than 30 years ago, which with relatively little change in the way competitive rugby is delivered, means more players are required to fulfil a 1st XV league season, which is having a corresponding negative effect on Lower XVs.
? This has been evidenced more clearly in recent times through data from Electronic Matchcards which shows on average 43 players to fulfill a 1st XV league season and some correlation with those clubs that use more players, having declining lower XV teams or increased walkover rates of Lower XVs.
? Alongside this there is a prevailing trend of less teams in the English Clubs Championship with teams dropping out into merit leagues, but also the merit leagues seeing some decline in teams in some regions.
? All of this is supported by insight from sources such as the National Rugby Survey (NRS), as well as anecdotally through club engagement, which highlights that players value ‘flexibility’ and ‘variety’ in their rugby offer as key in allowing them to maintain/increase their frequency of engagement with rugby.
? Whilst it is recognised that different levels of the community game and regions have different challenges and opportunities, the general question as to whether the competitive structure we have is the best one to ensure the future health of the Game had been raising its head in Club and CB forums throughout the last 12 months, and through competitions management issues coming to the surface in various areas of the country.
? With the ongoing work the RFU are undertaking in ‘Project Union’ to, amongst other things, strengthen and unite rugby union in England under the guiding principles of ‘players first’, ‘open to all’ and ‘financially strong’, and set against the context above, The Adult Male Competition Structure Group was created as a task group of the Community Game Board.
What is the purpose/scope?
? The Group’s purpose is to review the adult male competition structure of the English Club Championship from Level 3 downwards and recommend an optimal playing offer and structure that protects the future health of the Game for adult men by meeting the needs of current and future players, balancing quality of experience and player welfare needs with less travel whist at the same time protecting the (financial and other) sustainability of clubs.
? The Group will consider a number of areas and in particular the Group shall review and make recommendations to the CGB on: the principles and rationale behind how league rugby will be organised, the optimal number of matches including any cup and friendlies, the extent to which promotion and relegation is applied and the principles of playoffs, the optimal structure for management of competitions, the extent to which CB boundaries should be used to define leagues; what, if any, restrictions there should be on lower XV teams participating in leagues and the provision of national cup competitions. Finally the group will debate whether any recommendations should be put in place for the 2020/21 or 2021/22 season noting that CGB had already endorsed implementation for 2020/21.
? The group is Chaired by RFU Board member, and also a Council Member, and contains other Council Members including the Chairs of the two major Competitions Committees, members from other Unions / Sports, and RFU Staff.
What is the timeline?
July-Oct 2019: Nov / Dec 2019: Dec 2019:
Jan 2020:
Feb 2020:
March 2020: April 2020:
June 2020: Summer 2020: September 2020:
Information gathering
Wider consultation with the Game via listening group(s) and RFU Council Final update to CGB
CGB decision on recommendations
Discussion at Council
Review work and further information gathering
Council decision
Regulation changes put to Council for approval
Communication with the Game
New structures in place
What is the progress and what next?
? The Group has met twice, and considered insights and data from electronic matchcards, national rugby survey, case studies from the Game, and knowledge / feedback from those who sit on the Group.
? Outline principles have been agreed as; ensuring Competitions are delivering for players fist, a great player experience (convenience, accessible, fun), with less maybe more at certain levels, whilst ensuring appropriate level of competition and financially viability for clubs.
? The next stage of the process is to move to creation of various Competitions ‘models’ based on player insight. These will be agreed by the Group and then presented to CGB at end of October, along with a methodology for how and where these will be socialized, tested, researched with the Game.
? At its meeting on 24th October, CGB were updated on the Groups purpose, terms of ref., membership and headlines on insights, discussions, and direction of travel to date. Included Group member’s views and other feedback given since the last meeting, for example from SRU, NCA and DOCs (via Hertfordshire Clubs Meeting).
? CGB were asked to endorse the principles of the work done, namely creating a future structure that is delivering for players first and a great player experience (taking into account travel, welfare, changing socio-economic factors and the desired amount of matches players want to play at different levels, set against the impact of current structures). CGB were also asked to also feedback on what will be socialised with the Game, how it will be socialised, and the timing of implementation. CGB largely endorsed the principles of the Groups work, and the method / content for socialising with the Game.
? The plan is that this will happen via 8 listening panels covering players and other roles (separately) across regions over the next 4-6 weeks. The Competitions team in Rugby Growth are working through the details on this now and can share more in due course. It is planned that we will provide 3 options for season structure and league structures at these meetings (ranging from an evolution to something that more fully answers the insights and principles discussed), and then a facilitated discussion would be held allowing feedback to be captured and any new models / ideas proposed. The options would not include the status quo. There would also be one listening panel with RFU staff, to provide a comparison. CGB continued to endorse the timing of implementation in September 2020, though it was noted this was particularly tight and there may be areas that should be prioritised over others, in a final recommendation, depending on further feedback. The feedback from these listening panels will support a final recommendation from the Group to CGB and a CGB decision in January.
? The next meeting of the Group is 14th November and there will be an update for discussion at RFU Council is on 29th November. For further information, questions or feedback please contact:
? Competitions-Development@RFU.com

6
Regional Two (North & North East) / Re: N1E next season
« on: May 24, 2019, 07:31:36 PM »
I'm pleased the RFU are cutting down the travelling time, if Stockport get level transferred that's a 5 hour round trip for Percy Park. I think Burnage have also been asked to volunteer to go to N1E and have respectfully declined.

7
Other Senior Rugby / Re: RFU cut long distance travel subsidy
« on: May 10, 2019, 07:16:39 PM »
I don't think any clubs rely on the RFU travel subsidy, but the principal of cutting back any financial support to grassroots rugby is a bit off IMHO.

8
Other Senior Rugby / Re: RFU cut long distance travel subsidy
« on: May 10, 2019, 06:36:08 PM »
Level 6 clubs - North 1 East are going to get clobbered with a reduction of 60%

9
Other Senior Rugby / RFU cut long distance travel subsidy
« on: May 10, 2019, 05:40:56 PM »
The RFU have written to clubs today outlining the reduced travel subsidy for journeys over 150 miles round trip for next season. The cut is one third of the subsidy issued last year.
Ironically the email was sent out the Head of Rugby Growth!

10
Regional Two (North & North East) / Re: N1E next season
« on: April 17, 2019, 09:27:19 AM »
Aren't Penrith exempt from Level Transfer as they volunteered for N1E a couple of seasons ago? My guess would be Kendal, which of course is bonkers really as many clubs will drive past Penrith to get to Kendal.

11
I think you will find Malt are safe, even if WL win twice with bonus points Malt will have more wins which is the decider is points are equal

12
Other Senior Rugby / Re: 2019/2020
« on: March 27, 2019, 10:47:07 AM »
I understand the North Comp Committee met last night, so is it to be the status quo or changes 2020/21

13
Other Senior Rugby / Re: RFU North Review
« on: February 25, 2019, 04:46:54 PM »
Do level 6 clubs get a vote?

If it turns out to be ridiculous then I'll happily lead a break away, I've had over 20 emails already- however I haven't had time to fully digest the implications.
As far as I know all clubs in the north from L6 and below were emailed on Friday PM via club secretaries

14
Other Senior Rugby / Re: RFU North Review
« on: February 25, 2019, 04:16:18 PM »
I'm surprised that the Forum isn't buzzing over this topic as it will effect every club in one way or another and looks as though it's going to be railroaded in by RFU North for next season.

Has any club voted yet?

15
Other Senior Rugby / Re: RFU North Review
« on: January 25, 2019, 07:35:43 PM »
Thanks davie, I think this is the issue, it is the clubs who have a problem with this, perhaps a player survey would represent a more informed opinion. Not sure many clubs would vote for less games because of the financial impact as stated previously. Ultimately, if we run out of players there won't be any income anyway.
But the RFU insist that there are more players playing the game now than ever before :o

We all know different, so chances of them listening to players or clubs and taking views that differ to their agenda seem unlikely IMO

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5