Well in order to put some facts to the discussion and to appease those who are asking for the 'finer details' it's really quite easy to see just by accessing the Heath website and comparing the match reports/team sheets from the 2nd XV fixture against Old Rishworthians and the 1st XV fixture against Leodensians which took place the week earlier.
Now basing this purely on the account given by Heaths website from those 2 match reports, the 1st XV report against Leo's featured 3 of the same players that were named in the 2nd XV squad who played against Old Rishworthians a week later...2 of whom started in the 1st XV fixture against Leo's with one of those aforementioned players scoring 2 tries during the said 2nd XV fixture.
Although 2nd XV rugby is a great way to 'reintroduce' injured players back in to the fold, I find it difficult to accept that at least 2 of these 3 players needed such critical game time during a 2nd XV league match given that they were 'starters' only the week previously in a Yorkshire 1 clash? I appreciate that rugby is a team sport and 1, or in this case 3 men, shouldn't make all the difference but at this level it can have a significant impact and if you discount 2 tries that were scored by a clear first team regular it makes the result significantly more competitive (23-14) and potentially would have proved a more worthwhile experience for the younger crop of players to learn and develop from.