Author Topic: Fattest Tight Five?  (Read 1776 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline get that into yer!

  • Forum old hand
  • **
  • Posts: 382
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Fattest Tight Five?
« Reply #15 on: February 08, 2012, 09:54:22 AM »
i reckon scarborough's back line would give most packs a run for their money in the girth stakes!
*insert something profound here*

Offline Silverroyd seat warmer

  • Finding my feet
  • Posts: 75
    • View Profile
Re: Fattest Tight Five?
« Reply #16 on: February 08, 2012, 06:51:49 PM »
Maybe so, but it hasn't stopped them from giving most other back lines a run for their money either.

shrekane

  • Guest
Re: Fattest Tight Five?
« Reply #17 on: February 09, 2012, 11:17:38 AM »
Probally why there 9th running away with the league ?

Offline neverplayedstandoff

  • Deputy Moderator
  • Paternal Voice of the Silent Majority
  • *****
  • Posts: 962
    • View Profile
Re: Fattest Tight Five?
« Reply #18 on: February 09, 2012, 12:41:14 PM »
Perhaps they should consider swapping their backs and forwards round. :D
Y1 Pundits league winner 2010/11

Offline Jock Strap

  • Finding my feet
  • Posts: 45
  • Every day I wake up I thank the Lord I am WELSH
    • View Profile
Re: Fattest Tight Five?
« Reply #19 on: February 10, 2012, 05:47:33 AM »
Radcliffes not Fatcliffe he's TRYCLIFFE.

Offline get that into yer!

  • Forum old hand
  • **
  • Posts: 382
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Fattest Tight Five?
« Reply #20 on: February 10, 2012, 08:32:03 AM »
Radcliffes not Fatcliffe he's TRYCLIFFE.

TRYcliffe??! I've never heard such a ridiculous nickname, it doesn't even look/feel/sound like his proper name, unlike fatcliffe, which works visually, audibly, and not least, because he's fat
*insert something profound here*

Offline Red Horseman

  • Global Moderator
  • A little respect please...
  • *****
  • Posts: 1826
  • Aquila non capit moscas.
    • View Profile
Re: Fattest Tight Five?
« Reply #21 on: February 10, 2012, 08:47:01 AM »
Gaycliffe?  :o
When the second seal was opened another horse came out, a fiery red one. Its rider was given power to take peace from the earth and to make men slay each other. To him was given a large sword.

Offline The Enforcer

  • Legend
  • ***
  • Posts: 746
    • View Profile
Re: Fattest Tight Five?
« Reply #22 on: February 10, 2012, 10:14:33 AM »
Gaycliffe?  :o
Just RHM hoping for like minded company ?
TRYcliffe does work as he has TRYed every diet going all sadly to no effect  ;D ;D
The sword of moderation shall fall heavy upon the ungenerous .

Offline get that into yer!

  • Forum old hand
  • **
  • Posts: 382
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Fattest Tight Five?
« Reply #23 on: February 10, 2012, 10:35:34 AM »
Gaycliffe?  :o
Just RHM hoping for like minded company ?
TRYcliffe does work as he has TRYed every diet going all sadly to no effect  ;D ;D

this thread could become very amusing

Wycliffe (like him out of the Fugees) - as in WHYcan'thestopeatingCLIFFE?
*insert something profound here*

Offline The Enforcer

  • Legend
  • ***
  • Posts: 746
    • View Profile
Re: Fattest Tight Five?
« Reply #24 on: February 10, 2012, 11:14:41 AM »
Have you seen his personal web site its quite good its ww. ratcliffe .mmm pastys .nom nom nom
And i know there are only 2 Ws , it stands for weight watchers  ;D
The sword of moderation shall fall heavy upon the ungenerous .

Offline Wainhouse Tower

  • Finding my feet
  • Posts: 6
    • View Profile
Re: Fattest Tight Five?
« Reply #25 on: February 10, 2012, 10:17:04 PM »

PS think I have,over the years, played far more rugby than you have if you are who I think you are.

na then nevercaughtacoldnevermindarugbyball don't start getting personal. your nickname suggests that you've been 'talented' enough to play in all positions, barring 10.  i applaud such supposed talents but the question has to be asked...were you the last kid to get picked in the school play ground?

i think you may be off the mark with your guess who...try again.

shrekane

  • Guest
Re: Fattest Tight Five?
« Reply #26 on: February 11, 2012, 07:58:36 AM »
Eh?