Go to RFU North website to view the leagues for next season, in the news section.
So after all that North Ribb go into Regional 2 North West. Best start fundraising for the bus/boat trip to the Isle of Man now!
Wow if I was NR I would be seriously p1ssed. However, no one has died so let's keep in perspective.
Best of luck to everyone next season. Personally I'm sad I'm not going to NR.
BRB Your WOW is nothing compared to ours. I will not go into detail on here as I think it unfair if volunteers at whatever level are questioned (not criticised) on a public forum. The only thing I will say is this.
Regulation 6 (appendix 2.) States that a) Club with the total lowest mileage between them (Ribb and Crossleyans) and all the clubs in the league to be augmented (Regional 2NW) shall be moved.
If you use the RFU travel tool that they state is used, "Google maps on default settings" Crocs travel is 4.9% less that ours and as such I believe they should have been moved before us, as the next criteria says that if the two clubs involved have "Almost identical mileage" defined as a difference of 2% then the club with the least mileage in the club they would have been in will stay in that league. That would favour Crocs no doubt.
How can a professional organisation as the RFU not simply follow their own regs. Having spoken to the chair of the "Deciding committee" I was told that there is ambiguity in the wording of the regs and the decision was not appealable. He expressed sympathy but told me that was the decision and nothing could be done about it.
There are also issues with the comms from North ROC but I will not go into that on here. We have to accept our fate which we firmly believe is in direct contradiction of the regs we all have to adhere to as they are written. Forgive the pun, but you couldnt write it. Same as the RFU legal Eagles.
BRB
no need to cancel your Villa in the hills of Settle. Please let me know the date of your booking and you can attend Ribb as our guest, as we dont think there will be too many takers at Ribb from Sandbach, Waterloo and the Isle of Man!!!!
Seriously we would be delighted to welcome you and any others who fancy a trip to our outpost.
Quote from: Flaggy on May 21, 2025, 07:54 PMBRB Your WOW is nothing compared to ours. I will not go into detail on here as I think it unfair if volunteers at whatever level are questioned (not criticised) on a public forum. The only thing I will say is this.
Regulation 6 (appendix 2.) States that a) Club with the total lowest mileage between them (Ribb and Crossleyans) and all the clubs in the league to be augmented (Regional 2NW) shall be moved.
If you use the RFU travel tool that they state is used, "Google maps on default settings" Crocs travel is 4.9% less that ours and as such I believe they should have been moved before us, as the next criteria says that if the two clubs involved have "Almost identical mileage" defined as a difference of 2% then the club with the least mileage in the club they would have been in will stay in that league. That would favour Crocs no doubt.
How can a professional organisation as the RFU not simply follow their own regs. Having spoken to the chair of the "Deciding committee" I was told that there is ambiguity in the wording of the regs and the decision was not appealable. He expressed sympathy but told me that was the decision and nothing could be done about it.
There are also issues with the comms from North ROC but I will not go into that on here. We have to accept our fate which we firmly believe is in direct contradiction of the regs we all have to adhere to as they are written. Forgive the pun, but you couldnt write it. Same as the RFU legal Eagles.
I think you'll find there is certainly precedent for appealing.
And more so when you look at the record of RFU North.
And lets not forget, this all stems from the ridiculous six second placed teams with the best results ---- except that's not how they decided it.
all in the best interests of player welfare,respecting the interests of players and clubs yada yada yada. It was nonsense then and it's nonsense now.
And worse, some clown wants to give regional more power!!! FFS.
Oh, and where did this R1/2 are effectively National leagues come from? Strange that the actual RFU don't see it that way.
Bit awkward but saying you're willing to consider level transfer one way you've already opened yourself up to having to spend long winter days over in the dark valleys.
Good luck, will hope to revisit Ribb at some point if I'm still lacing the boots up.
Even without Ribb R2NE looks like a very, very tough even league..
Stella
just to be clear the North ROC had recommended something different to the outcome for us on two occasions. It is the Chair of the deciding committee who has overruled them and personally told me there was no process to appeal. The new leagues have now been published so we have no option but to knuckle down and, hopefully, make lots of new friends. Last time I was on the Isle of Man was on a Ribb tour in 1982!!!
Rob
it wouldnt have made any difference as the man chairing the committee at Twickers has overruled the North ROC. Suspect that the "Old Boys" network has been brought into play by someone well connected with HQ at Old Crocs. If that is the case they have done a sterling job between them.
NE2 looks like a tasty league next year. I suspect most clubs will be going heavy on recruitment!
Glad we finally have a conclusion and can start to plan accordingly.
That's a turn up Flaggy but a trip to the Isle of Man is an opportunity to have some fun.
I'm sure you will do well in that league as it's not as strong as Yorkshire although the N2W clubs might refuse to travel to Settle as they don't like scenic destinations. 🫤
Quote from: davie on May 22, 2025, 12:47 PMThat's a turn up Flaggy but a trip to the Isle of Man is an opportunity to have some fun.
I'm sure you will do well in that league as it's not as strong as Yorkshire although the N2W clubs might refuse to travel to Settle as they don't like scenic destinations. 🫤
Read an article regarding transport provision for the IOM trips. Fun most certainly wasn't included.
New season structure just released.
See attached.
Quote from: Flaggy on May 22, 2025, 07:22 AMRob
it wouldnt have made any difference as the man chairing the committee at Twickers has overruled the North ROC. Suspect that the "Old Boys" network has been brought into play by someone well connected with HQ at Old Crocs. If that is the case they have done a sterling job between them.
Ah well
Quote from: "ribbflagman" on May 22, 2025, 03:31 PMQuote from: Flaggy on May 22, 2025, 07:22 AMRob
it wouldnt have made any difference as the man chairing the committee at Twickers has overruled the North ROC. Suspect that the "Old Boys" network has been brought into play by someone well connected with HQ at Old Crocs. If that is the case they have done a sterling job between them.
Ah well
:o
What are people's thoughts on this....
https://www.rfunorth.com/wp-content/uploads/go-x/u/dca69547-7831-449c-8ca9-e652324fe605/Structured-Season-25-26-Presentation-Playoffs-Regional-Only.pdf
Quote from: Forward Pass on May 23, 2025, 07:56 PMWhat are people's thoughts on this....
https://www.rfunorth.com/wp-content/uploads/go-x/u/dca69547-7831-449c-8ca9-e652324fe605/Structured-Season-25-26-Presentation-Playoffs-Regional-Only.pdf
A total crock of 💩
They just don't listen do they.
And just when do they think any county Cup games would be played? There are walkovers in them too but not as many as that tin pot pizza nonsense.
Content of an email just received from ISB - League secretary. In his defence, he is just the messenger.
RFU Consultation for Regional One and Two Structure
The RFU are consulting with Regional One and Two clubs about the structure of the league and cup programme for future seasons.
Structured Season 25-26 Presentation - Playoffs - Regional Only
FOR CLUBS PLAYING IN REGIONAL 1 & 2 LEAGUES IN 2025/26
Dear Club
As many of you may know, in the last few months it has been agreed in principle to introduce playoffs through the National Leagues, starting next season. The overall sense was that play-offs would bring strong additional value to the league programme, and work is now underway to develop draft regulations to take back to the National League Rugby Executive for their input. These changes follow those adopted by 'Champ Rugby' (Tier 2) and as a result also present opportunities for us now to accelerate or look at potential similar initiatives to Regional levels of rugby across England. We know from Clubs at Regional level that there is appetite from many for change relating to the existing Cup model and we have been discussing formats to do this alongside the overall goal of offering a playing programme that maintains interest in the league season right to the end. We now want to speak to Clubs to get their ideas and feedback to shape the season at Regional levels, we think the introduction of playoffs could be an effective way to go but we want Clubs' help in shaping any future development.
We would therefore like to invite you to a webinar to gain your feedback on the existing league and cup schedule and a proposal for an alternative enhanced league programme that concludes with play-offs for promotion and relegation, as well as any other ideas you may have. The below video from Terry Burwell, Chair of Adult Competitions Management Committee, and attached slide deck should bring to life the rationale for change as well as some ideas for potential changes to how the season is delivered.
https://we.tl/t-oTyMChhmCl
On the webinar, it would be ideal if your club had an administrator/committee member, DOR/Coach or a senior player. We would also request that you speak with your players prior to the meeting to get feedback on the options. If you require any clarification or if you have any initial feedback or questions, please email Competitions-Development@rfu.com. It should be stressed that this is not a league review or restructure, the core principles of the current structured are retained, and any changes would constitute a change of regulation, potentially for season 25/26. The dates for webinars are split across different regional groupings of clubs, please sign up for the one that is most relevant to you.
We look forward to your contribution
Terry Burwell – Adult Competitions Chair – 07710 472824 - TerryBurwell@rfu.com
Chris Brookes – Adult Competitions Council Member – 07999 494378 - ChristopherBrookes@RFU.com
Ben Lowe – Player Experience Director RFU – 07595 863013 - BenLowe@RFU.com
Additional background
· At Regional level, the present Cup competition has been in place for three seasons and in 24/25 the level of clubs not entering or withdrawing from the competition has meant only 32/72 clubs at Regional One and 64/144 at Regional Two have participated.
· Additional data evidence suggests reduced interest and player availability in post Xmas league fixtures with increased meaningless matches for a number of clubs in each league.
· An alternative to the Cup competition is to focus on the league competition, providing greater promotion opportunity and increased interest and jeopardy through an end of season play-off model.
· Teams winning each league are automatically promoted and qualify for a Champions Cup at each level of the competition providing high interest climax to season
· Play-offs would take place in the window currently reserved for Cup competitions at end of season with no impact on County Championship schedule.
· Increasing opportunity for promotion also increases jeopardy in the league programme
· Clubs not involved in play-offs could participate in an end of season Cup competition if the demand is there to supply one
· No change in league structure is required, only a change to regulation to define mechanism for promotion and relegation.
Dates for the webinars:
9th June – Regional One
6.00pm – Southeast * Southwest * Northeast
8.00pm – South Central * Midlands * Northwest
10th June – Regional Two
6.00pm – Southwest * Southeast * Midlands North
8.00pm – Severn * Anglia * Northwest
11th June – Regional Two
6.00pm – South Central * Midlands East * North
8.00pm – Thames * Midlands West * Northeast
Please complete the form in the following link to immediately receive the meeting link via email:
https://forms.office.com/e/gqjENEt5MV
WHICH PLANET do these people reside on because it is obviously not Earth.
Given the number of clubs not entering and also the number of walkovers, why would any sane person think that the take up would be any different under another guise. PLEASE let common sense prevail and get back to 14 team leagues that will put all this nonsense to bed once and for all.
Another example (IMHO) of the powers that be not accepting what the majority of the clubs want but seem determined to extend the playing season into May when they keep telling us that players want to play fewer games. They do appear totally deaf to the clubs voices which I think is nothing short of a disgrace.
Looks like our county comps will take place in June to July (if they survive), What a complete joke.
I'm struggling to see the issue with the proposal.
Finish top and promotion
2nd - 5th enter a playoff, giving meaningful games throughout the season
12th & 11th relegated with 10th & 9th in a relegation playoff, again adding meaningful rugby for all clubs at the end of the season.
Not guaranteed another home fixture but it's on the cards.
Now I was a fan of the Cup competition at first so yet could be wrong again. But feel this does add extra league games, whilst ensuring the integrity of the leagues throughout the year.
Quote from: Differ Lid on May 24, 2025, 08:57 AMI'm struggling to see the issue with the proposal.
Finish top and promotion
2nd - 5th enter a playoff, giving meaningful games throughout the season
12th & 11th relegated with 10th & 9th in a relegation playoff, again adding meaningful rugby for all clubs at the end of the season.
Not guaranteed another home fixture but it's on the cards.
Now I was a fan of the Cup competition at first so yet could be wrong again. But feel this does add extra league games, whilst ensuring the integrity of the leagues throughout the year.
And totally contradicts their primary reason for cutting league sizes.
And what about their ridiculous suggestion of a cup competition for thos finishing mid table when they can't get teams to play in the current cup comps?
Remember, they were warned about all this when they lied to the clubs before they cut the leagues.
Have a watch of the video
https://we.tl/t-oTyMChhmCl
All this after extensive consultation. So, anyone been consulted? Nah, i didn't think so.
Quote from: Flaggy on May 21, 2025, 07:54 PMBRB Your WOW is nothing compared to ours. I will not go into detail on here as I think it unfair if volunteers at whatever level are questioned (not criticised) on a public forum. The only thing I will say is this.
Regulation 6 (appendix 2.) States that a) Club with the total lowest mileage between them (Ribb and Crossleyans) and all the clubs in the league to be augmented (Regional 2NW) shall be moved.
If you use the RFU travel tool that they state is used, "Google maps on default settings" Crocs travel is 4.9% less that ours and as such I believe they should have been moved before us, as the next criteria says that if the two clubs involved have "Almost identical mileage" defined as a difference of 2% then the club with the least mileage in the club they would have been in will stay in that league. That would favour Crocs no doubt.
How can a professional organisation as the RFU not simply follow their own regs. Having spoken to the chair of the "Deciding committee" I was told that there is ambiguity in the wording of the regs and the decision was not appealable. He expressed sympathy but told me that was the decision and nothing could be done about it.
There are also issues with the comms from North ROC but I will not go into that on here. We have to accept our fate which we firmly believe is in direct contradiction of the regs we all have to adhere to as they are written. Forgive the pun, but you couldnt write it. Same as the RFU legal Eagles.
Would the Chair of this committee be the same chap who's announced the latest play off fudge? Terry Burwell.
I can confirm that. Zero consultation for us lowlifes. Complete shambles that somebody at some point should be made to explain their decision making process and explain why we as the clubs that are affected by it have had no consultation. In my opinion this is why the RFU is held in low respect from the very clubs that it is supposed to represent.
Shambles yet again.
I thought the whole point of the RFU documents was to start a discussion with clubs about these proposed changes?
You can have your say at the Webinar.
Davie, dont worry I intend to speak on behalf of our club as well as (hopefully) other less vocal clubs. Its a total disgrace that we have not been consulted on possible changes to our season that, to me, seems to be in total contradiction of the reasons for reducing league sizes to 12 and then wanting to extend the season until May. Totally Bonkers.
Quote from: davie on May 25, 2025, 12:13 PMI thought the whole point of the RFU documents was to start a discussion with clubs about these proposed changes?
You can have your say at the Webinar.
They've already decided.
It's the old classic from the RFU
"When we want your opinion, we'll give it to you."
Now, the interesting bit that they haven't mentioned is; What if a team doesn't want to go up? What if a team refuses to play in the play offs?
Well they certainly acted that way when they reduced the leagues to 12 teams after claiming they'd consulted players etc who apparently weren't interested in playing rugby. I was hoping the shot across the Sweeney bow had perduaded them to do things properly.
It would appear not Davie. The latest ramblings on video from Terry Burwell says it all. Zero consultation from the clubs they are supposed to support.
When will it ever improve.????
Stella,
I asked Mr Burwell that question and was told"Dont do that." Do you really want to start from the bottom level" Just like Worcester have not had to do despite not paying the bills left with their local suppliers. The RFU talk about morals and respectful standards but they simply do not show them in their actions. Double standards matched only in our country by the current lying government.
If a team doesnt play in the playoffs it will simply be another Walkover. They dont seem to get the message whatever happens.
It's odd that the one thing they don't want to consider is 14 team leagues?
BRB
Why would anybody at HQ consider the thoughts of any of us bottom fishing clubs. We are given no respect at all and then just expected to tow the party line. Not acceptable.
But I can't see why they would die on a hill for something that really makes no difference to them? Unless some people are just digging their heels in to save face....
I'm not a big fan of play-offs. All the effort that goes into securing a runner-up spot over the course of the season can be completely undone by losing to a team that finished well below you in the standings. It just doesn't sit right with me, though I understand others may see it differently.
I recognise that those in charge are trying to recover from reducing league sizes and the backlash surrounding an unpopular cup competition. But this feels like yet another short-term fix rather than a well-thought-out solution.
Ideally, I'd like to see a return to 14-team leagues for the 2026/27 season, with a Yorkshire Cup competition running throughout the year and culminating in finals at the season's end. There's simply not enough enthusiasm among players or clubs for a post-season cup competition—especially one plagued by walkovers, long travel, and added costs.
Ultimately, I suspect the proposed changes will go through, regardless of whether they have the full backing of the clubs.
It's ironic that the guy bangs on about jeopardy but they all roll over when the PRL say no.
Quote from: Flaggy on May 21, 2025, 07:54 PMBRB Your WOW is nothing compared to ours. I will not go into detail on here as I think it unfair if volunteers at whatever level are questioned (not criticised) on a public forum. The only thing I will say is this.
Regulation 6 (appendix 2.) States that a) Club with the total lowest mileage between them (Ribb and Crossleyans) and all the clubs in the league to be augmented (Regional 2NW) shall be moved.
If you use the RFU travel tool that they state is used, "Google maps on default settings" Crocs travel is 4.9% less that ours and as such I believe they should have been moved before us, as the next criteria says that if the two clubs involved have "Almost identical mileage" defined as a difference of 2% then the club with the least mileage in the club they would have been in will stay in that league. That would favour Crocs no doubt.
How can a professional organisation as the RFU not simply follow their own regs. Having spoken to the chair of the "Deciding committee" I was told that there is ambiguity in the wording of the regs and the decision was not appealable. He expressed sympathy but told me that was the decision and nothing could be done about it.
There are also issues with the comms from North ROC but I will not go into that on here. We have to accept our fate which we firmly believe is in direct contradiction of the regs we all have to adhere to as they are written. Forgive the pun, but you couldnt write it. Same as the RFU legal Eagles.
Seems you haven't appealed loud enough. Tigers complained and have had their move to Nat2 West turned over. They are staying in the North - according to their facebook page.
Perhaps you need to look at the situation again.
Here's the Tigers facebook post.
Dear Tigers members, players and supporters,
Last Thursday, the 15th May, the Committee were told the clubs 1st XV would be transferred to National 2 West next season.
Since then the Committee, led by Paul digging his heels in and phoning John Inverdale on a daily basis, have communicated with various RFU officials to politely point out the financial and player availability ramifications of a team from Sheffield being asked to travel to Cambourne, Redruth, Exeter, Barnstaple, Taunton, Weston-Super-Mare, Bristol, etc.
We are delighted to say that the RFU have just announced Tigers will remain in National 2 North next season and this will be made public very shortly.
We would like to apologise for not keeping everyone informed during the various discussions and overtures being made to the RFU on behalf of the club, but we were being told almost daily a decision will be made imminently, only for it to be delayed again and again while the RFU convened an emergency working group to discuss next seasons make-up of the National Leagues given our stance.
We completely understand the RFU needed time to examine the matter properly and professionally, so hope you also understand the position we were put in where there was no good news to convey, until now!
We have been told no other club has 'dug their heels in' until now with regards been transferred to another League, which is what made the RFU reverse their original decision and, as importantly, look to review the whole National League structure going forward.
As we now look to push on with various club projects to improve the clubhouse and grounds, we sincerely hope you will all join together with us on the journey to revitalise our great club which we all love dearly. If we won't do it no-one else will.
Kind regards,
Sheffield Tigers RUFC Committee
Playoffs is a great idea..
Add some jeopardy at the end of the season. I do however agree that 14 league teams is much easier for everyone.
Quote from: crash ball on May 26, 2025, 09:46 AMI'm not a big fan of play-offs. All the effort that goes into securing a runner-up spot over the course of the season can be completely undone by losing to a team that finished well below you in the standings. It just doesn't sit right with me, though I understand others may see it differently.
I recognise that those in charge are trying to recover from reducing league sizes and the backlash surrounding an unpopular cup competition. But this feels like yet another short-term fix rather than a well-thought-out solution.
Ideally, I'd like to see a return to 14-team leagues for the 2026/27 season, with a Yorkshire Cup competition running throughout the year and culminating in finals at the season's end. There's simply not enough enthusiasm among players or clubs for a post-season cup competition—especially one plagued by walkovers, long travel, and added costs.
Ultimately, I suspect the proposed changes will go through, regardless of whether they have the full backing of the clubs.
The big difference between us and Tigers is that our increased mileage is relatively a low increase when theirs would have more than doubled their travel and probably tripled their costs as dont thiunk its feasable to travel to Cornwall and back in a day and warm up, play, warm down, be fed and get back on a coach as even from Sheffield its a 500-600 mile round trip for more than half their fixtures. Our gripe is not the distance but the increased costs as we will be unable to use the train network for any games other than Vale Of Lune (which will become our Derby game). As every other game is between 60 and 99 miles each way it will involve 9 buses and a Flight/ferry trip to the IOM.
Last season we used cars on two occasions, Train on four times(Maximun cost £380 including Ubers from station and return) and buses five times. Average cost £830, Max £920 - min £670
Whatever happens we have accepted our fate and hope we will acquit ourselves well, but, the cost will be crippling for a small community club such as ours.
As a complete aside can I ask all you R2NE posters to tell me what your admission fees were for last and next season.
Regards and good look to all. Sorry we wont be seeing you next season.
Flaggy.
Quote from: Flaggy on May 30, 2025, 05:44 PMThe big difference between us and Tigers is that our increased mileage is relatively a low increase when theirs would have more than doubled their travel and probably tripled their costs as dont thiunk its feasable to travel to Cornwall and back in a day and warm up, play, warm down, be fed and get back on a coach as even from Sheffield its a 500-600 mile round trip for more than half their fixtures. Our gripe is not the distance but the increased costs as we will be unable to use the train network for any games other than Vale Of Lune (which will become our Derby game). As every other game is between 60 and 99 miles each way it will involve 9 buses and a Flight/ferry trip to the IOM.
Last season we used cars on two occasions, Train on four times(Maximun cost £380 including Ubers from station and return) and buses five times. Average cost £830, Max £920 - min £670
Whatever happens we have accepted our fate and hope we will acquit ourselves well, but, the cost will be crippling for a small community club such as ours.
As a complete aside can I ask all you R2NE posters to tell me what your admission fees were for last and next season.
Regards and good look to all. Sorry we wont be seeing you next season.
Flaggy.
But Chester and Lymm are now having to do it.
Quote from: Flaggy on May 30, 2025, 05:44 PMThe big difference between us and Tigers is that our increased mileage is relatively a low increase when theirs would have more than doubled their travel and probably tripled their costs as dont thiunk its feasable to travel to Cornwall and back in a day and warm up, play, warm down, be fed and get back on a coach as even from Sheffield its a 500-600 mile round trip for more than half their fixtures. Our gripe is not the distance but the increased costs as we will be unable to use the train network for any games other than Vale Of Lune (which will become our Derby game). As every other game is between 60 and 99 miles each way it will involve 9 buses and a Flight/ferry trip to the IOM.
Last season we used cars on two occasions, Train on four times(Maximun cost £380 including Ubers from station and return) and buses five times. Average cost £830, Max £920 - min £670
Whatever happens we have accepted our fate and hope we will acquit ourselves well, but, the cost will be crippling for a small community club such as ours.
As a complete aside can I ask all you R2NE posters to tell me what your admission fees were for last and next season.
Regards and good look to all. Sorry we wont be seeing you next season.
Flaggy.
Scarborough
Non-members £8
Members £6
Under 18s Free of charge.
You should perhaps also ask what people get for their money....
Double this year to pay mr Fodens wages? 😉
Quote from: backrowbandit on May 30, 2025, 05:53 PMQuote from: Flaggy on May 30, 2025, 05:44 PMThe big difference between us and Tigers is that our increased mileage is relatively a low increase when theirs would have more than doubled their travel and probably tripled their costs as dont thiunk its feasable to travel to Cornwall and back in a day and warm up, play, warm down, be fed and get back on a coach as even from Sheffield its a 500-600 mile round trip for more than half their fixtures. Our gripe is not the distance but the increased costs as we will be unable to use the train network for any games other than Vale Of Lune (which will become our Derby game). As every other game is between 60 and 99 miles each way it will involve 9 buses and a Flight/ferry trip to the IOM.
Last season we used cars on two occasions, Train on four times(Maximun cost £380 including Ubers from station and return) and buses five times. Average cost £830, Max £920 - min £670
Whatever happens we have accepted our fate and hope we will acquit ourselves well, but, the cost will be crippling for a small community club such as ours.
As a complete aside can I ask all you R2NE posters to tell me what your admission fees were for last and next season.
Regards and good look to all. Sorry we wont be seeing you next season.
Flaggy.
Scarborough
Non-members £8
Members £6
Under 18s Free of charge.
You should perhaps also ask what people get for their money....
nope - he's not on big money. Well, not by our standards ;)
Come on gents, please follow BRBs lead and tell me your admission charges for the season just finished.
PLEASE.
Quote from: Flaggy on Jun 03, 2025, 05:46 PMCome on gents, please follow BRBs lead and tell me your admission charges for the season just finished.
PLEASE.
Malt currently
£7.50
U18s Free
Season ticket valued which is bought alongside membership £40
It's part of a value for money review we are undertaking.
Wetherby
£5 home or away
kids free entry
Vice President membership £120 a year includes "season ticket" (standard non playing membership is £60 per year).
Thanks for that gents. Any more ???
Rochdale £5 an adult (home or away), kids free
Thanks Guys, sorry we wont see you next season. Heres hoping for 2026/2027.
What are North Rib charging?
£5 for all last season. Good value in my opinion.
Quote from: Flaggy on Jun 05, 2025, 06:04 AM£5 for all last season. Good value in my opinion.
Outrageous pricing — no wonder Grove Park was so quiet last season
Behave Roachy. I think I recall you having a good time at the scenic Grove Park. I know that the game was worth more than a fiver to watch. An epic contest between two good sides.
Good luck next season.
None Members £7
Members £4
Children / U16s free
Scarborough committee £10
Quote from: carlthewlisjohns on Jun 08, 2025, 03:50 PMNone Members £7
Members £4
Children / U16s free
Scarborough committee £10
Oh we get a discount to last season... excellent!